Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 993 F.2d 1348 - Alexander v. Peffer

Alexander v. Peffer’s Empirical Analysis

993 F.2d 1348 · 1993

Citation profile

70
cited by 70 later decisions
June 2020
most recently cited

28 federal appellate · 9 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 70 later decisions — most recently June 2020 · most notably Frey v. City of Herculaneum (1995), Denius v. Dunlap (2000)

28 federal appellate · 9 district ·

3601993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Hishon v. King & Spalding · Paul v. Davis · Collins v. City of Harker Heights · Palko v. State of Connecticut · Whalen v. Roe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]o violate [a person's] constitutional right of privacy the information disclosed must be either a shocking degradation or an egregious humiliation of her to further some specific state interest, or a flagrant bre[a]ch of a pledge of confidentiality which was instrumental in obtaining the personal information.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “it is clear that no relief could be granted under any set of facts that could be proved consistent with the allegations.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “In Whalen v. Roe , 429 U.S. 589 , 97 S. Ct. 869 , 51 L. Ed. 2d 64 (1977) ( Whalen ), the Supreme Court determined that one component of the protection of the right to privacy embodied in the [F]ourteenth [A]mendment is an individual's interest in avoiding disclosures of personal matters.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.