Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

993 F.2d 1453

Docket Nos. 90-56125, 91-55012.

Romberg

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

June 8, 1993.

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently May 1995

1 federal appellate ·

Relies on Farrar v. Hobby · McNeil v. United States

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Stephen Yagman, Yagman & Yagman, Venice, CA, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Keith A. Fink, Cotkin & Collins, Los Angeles, CA, for defendants-appellees.

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court.

Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, THOMPSON and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

¶1

Pursuant to the order of the Supreme Court of the United States, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 1038, 122 L.Ed.2d 348 we vacate the award of attorneys' fees and remand this case to the United States District Court for the Central District of California for reconsideration in light of Farrar v. Hobby, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 566, 121 L.Ed.2d 494 (1992).

/993/f2d/1453 · .json · Public domain