Public-domain · open source

993 F.2d 1453

Docket Nos. 90-56125, 91-55012.

Romberg v. Nichols

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided June 8, 1993.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1993-06-08

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently February 1995

2 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Farrar v. Hobby · McNeil v. United States

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1993-06-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Stephen Yagman, Yagman & Yagman, Venice, CA, for plaintiffs-appellants.

¶2Keith A. Fink, Cotkin & Collins, Los Ange-les, CA, for defendants-appellees.

¶3Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, THOMPSON and O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.

¶4ORDER

¶5Pursuant to the order of the Supreme Court of the United States, - U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1038, 122 L.Ed.2d 348 we vacate the award of attorneys’ fees and remand this case to the United States District Court for the Central District of California for reconsideration in light of Farrar v. Hobby, - U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 566, 121 L.Ed.2d 494 (1992).