Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

993 F.2d 1536

Docket No. 93-6356.

Clifton v. Reyes

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: May 3, 1993 Decided: May 28, 1993

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1993-05-28

Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Truong Dinh Hung v. United States · Evans v. Croom

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1993-05-28

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-92-1271-AM)

James E. Clifton, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before RUSSELL and HALL, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

¶1

James E. Clifton filed a civil rights suit pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), and sought leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The district court assessed a filing fee in accordance with Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and dismissed the case without prejudice when Plaintiff failed to comply with the fee order. Plaintiff appeals. Finding no abuse of discretion, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

/993/f2d/1536 · .json · Public domain