Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

993 F.2d 1537

Docket No. 93-6291.

McCarroll v. Hill

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: May 3, 1993 Decided: May 28, 1993

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1993-05-28

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Truong Dinh Hung v. United States · Evans v. Croom

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1993-05-28

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-92-257-BR)

Edward Lonnie McCarroll, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.N.C.

DISMISSED.

Before RUSSELL and HALL, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

¶1

Edward Lonnie McCarroll filed suit under 42 U.S.C.s 1983 (1988) and sought leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The district court assessed a filing fee in accordance with Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and dismissed the case without prejudice* when Plaintiff failed to comply with the fee order. Plaintiff appeals. Finding no abuse of discretion, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

*

Although the district court did not so state, we note that dismissal for failing to pay a filing fee is without prejudice

/993/f2d/1537 · .json · Public domain