Estes v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
993 F.2d 161 · 1993
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently August 2011
5 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · United States v. Campbell · Kostelecky v. NL Acme Tool/NL Industries, Inc. · Morgan v. City of Marmaduke
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“While the existence of probable cause is a mixed question of law and fact, the ultimate conclusion is a question of law. The proposed testimony was, therefore, not opinion testimony but rather it was a statement of a legal conclusion. [Citation omitted]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Peterson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.