Prisco v. Talty’s Empirical Analysis
993 F.2d 21 · 1993
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently August 2011
9 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Santosky v. Kramer · Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc. · Bradley v. School Board of City of Richmond · Bates v. State Bar
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“federal officials do not possess discretion to violate constitutional rights or federal statutes”) (quoting U.S. Fid. & Guar. Co. v. United States, 837 F.2d 116 , 120 (3d Cir.1988)); Nurse v. United States, 226 F.3d 996 , 1002 (9th Cir.2000) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.