Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 993 F.2d 338 - United States v. Craddock

United States v. Craddock’s Empirical Analysis

993 F.2d 338 · 1993

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
December 2014
most recently cited

27 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently December 2014 · most notably United States v. Coyle (1995), United States v. Sokolow (1996)

27 federal appellate · 2 district ·

260199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1029 · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. United States · Mayers v. United States · United States v. Parker · United States v. Hill · United States v. Georgiadis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]f the defendant abused a position of public or private trust... in a manner that significantly facilitated the commission or concealment of the offense”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The position of trust must have contributed in some substantial way to facilitating the crime and not merely have provided an opportunity that could as easily have been afforded to other persons. This adjustment, for example, would not apply to an embezzlement by an ordinary bank teller.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[O]ne has been placed in a position of trust when, by virtue of the authority conferred by the employer and the lack of controls imposed on that authority, he is able to commit an offense that is not readily discoverable.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.