Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 993 F.2d 595 - Souter v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers, Local 72

Souter v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers, Local 72’s Empirical Analysis

993 F.2d 595 · 1993

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
June 2016
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently June 2016 · most notably Lb Credit Corporation v. Resolution Trust Corporation, as Receiver for Concordia Federal Bank for Savings (1995), Retired Chicago Police Ass'n v. City of Chicago (1996)

17 federal appellate · 1 district ·

270199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Vaca v. Sipes · United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Mitchell · Air Line Pilots Ass'n v. O'Neill · Bryson Properties, XVIII v. Travelers Insurance Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the union's willingness to pursue [plaintiff's] meritorious claim tends to show that it bore no ill will toward him [when it dropped his meritless claim]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “showed only that the union questioned the merit of Souter's grievance, not that it treated Souter with hostility or in bad faith.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.