May v. Arkansas Forestry Commission’s Empirical Analysis
993 F.2d 632 · 1993
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently January 2013
16 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956)
Relies on Skidmore v. Swift & Co. · National League of Cities v. Usery · Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority · New York v. United States · Gregory v. Ashcroft
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“). Accordingly, evidence that Officers Vanalmsick and Long created the need to use force by their actions prior to the moment of seizure is irrelevant to the issues presented here, and therefore the district court did not abuse its discretion in excluding it. 3 26 Appellant next argues that the district court erred in excluding evidence that the officers should have responded in a different manner, or that the officers should have used a lesser degree of force. 4 However, the Fourth Amendment does not allow this type of”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Schulz v. Long“The following are not excluded by the hearsay rule, even though the declarant is available as a witness: $ ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ (8) Public records and reports. Records, reports, statements, or data compilations, in any form, of public offices or agencies ... (C) in civil actions and proceedings and against the Government in criminal cases, factual findings resulting from an investigation made pursuant to authority granted by law, unless the sources of information or other circumstances indicate lack of trustworthiness.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“In reviewing this ruling, we must give substantial deference to the district court's decision on the admissibility of evidence, and we will not find error unless the district court clearly abused its discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Schulz v. Long
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.