Hendricks v. Zenon’s Empirical Analysis
993 F.2d 664 · 1993
Citation profile
76 federal appellate · 4 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 110 later decisions — most recently January 2010 · most notably 15 Cal. 4th 1 - People v. Marshall (1997), Trimble v. City of Santa Rosa (1995)
76 federal appellate · 4 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Faretta v. California · Penson v. Ohio · United States v. Bagley · United States v. Agurs
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 110 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Although a defendant need not himself have the skill and experience of a lawyer in order competently and intelligently to choose self-representation, he should he made aware of the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation, so that the record will establish that “he knows what he is doing and his choice is made with eyes open.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Moran v. Godinez · Moran v. Godinez“For a waiver to be made knowingly and intelligently, [a defendant] must be aware of the nature of the charges against him, the possible penalties, and the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.