993 F.2d 784 - The Cone Corporation v. Hillsborough County — 993 F.2d 784

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2017 · most notably United States v. Councilman (2005), DIRECTV Inc. v. Pepe (2005)

11 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

¶1 993 F.2d 784

¶263 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 42,643

¶3The CONE CORPORATION; J.W. Conner & Sons; Bulger
Contracting Co.; Boyce Company; S & E
Contractors, Inc.; Woodruff & Sons,
Inc.; Suncoast Utility
Contractors
Association,
Plaintiffs-
Appellants,
Cone Constructors, Inc.; Dallas 1 Construction &
Development, Inc., Plaintiffs,
v.
HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY; Frederick B. Karl, Defendants-Appellees.

¶4No. 91-4194.

¶5United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.

¶6June 7, 1993.

¶7Herbert P. Schlanger, Atlanta, GA, for plaintiffs-appellants.

¶8MacFarlane, Ferguson, Allison & Kelly, Claude H. Tison, Jr., Tampa, FL, for defendants-appellees.

¶9Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. (No. 89-540-Civ-T-17A), Elizabeth A. Kovachevich, District Judge.

¶10ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

¶11(Opinion February 8, 1993, 11th Cir., 1993 983 F.2d 197)

¶12Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, and CARNES, Circuit Judges.*

¶13BY THE COURT:

¶14A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on plaintiffs-appellants' suggestion of rehearing en banc, and a majority of the judges of this court in active service having voted in favor thereof,

¶15IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court sitting en banc. The previous panel's opinion 983 F.2d 197, is hereby VACATED.

¶16 Senior U.S. Circuit Judge John C. Godbold has elected to participate in further proceedings in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(c)