United States v. Phillip J. Campbell

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

April 20, 1993.

This page is marked noindex.

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1993-04-20

Relies on City of Mesa v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission · James E. Cavallo v. Securities and Exchange Commission

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1993-04-20

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.

Before: MIKVA, Chief Judge, and D.H. GINSBURG and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

¶1

This case was considered on the record and on the briefs and oral argument of counsel. The Court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for a published opinion. See D.C.Cir.R. 14(c). Therefore, it is

¶2

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that appellant's conviction is affirmed because the District Court committed no error in admitting the disputed evidence.

¶3

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after the disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.R. 15(b)(2).