Van Praagh v. Gratton’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1065 (§ 15 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act)) · 15 U.S.C. § 1114 (§ 32 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act)) · 15 U.S.C. § 1125 (§ 43 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act))
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Zinermon v. Burch · Polaroid Corp. v. Polarad Electronics Corp. · Oswego Laborers' Local 214 Pension Fund v. Marine Midland Bank, N. A.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(quotations and citation omitted) ); Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. Jamelis Grocery, Inc. , 378 F.Supp.2d 448 , 456 (S.D.N.Y. 2005) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“specific and substantial injury to the public interest over and above the ordinary trademark infringement....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.