Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 993 P.2d 232 - State v. Leleae

State v. Leleae’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
February 2025
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 2025

10 state decisions

501999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Beech Aircraft Corp. v. Rainey · State v. Menzies · State v. Hamilton · United States v. Branch · State v. James

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “persuasive but not necessarily binding duthority”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[Flederal cases interpreting analogous Federal Rules are compelling to our interpretation of the Utah Rules only insofar as their reasoning is logical and persuasive.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Whether the statement was officially introduced as evidence or read from a transcript, as was done in this case, is irrelevant. The effect on the jury was the same.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.