F.S.E. v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently February 2010
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on New Jersey v. T. L. O. · Vernonia School District 47J v. Acton · Cason v. Cook
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1. The Assistant Principal was acting in an investigatory manner and as an agent of the State when she questioned the juvenile. Any statements made by the juvenile without his parents present should be suppressed and any purported consent to the search of his vehicle was invalid. 2. The Assistant Principal was acting as an agent of the State when she conducted the search of the juvenile's vehicle. The search violated the juvenile's Fourth Amendment rights and therefore any evidence obtained during that search must be suppressed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. FSE v. State“in the ash tray of his car which was parked on school premises. His story was that he was tardy because his car had a flat tire on the way to school and that some”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. FSE v. State“no tolerance, no drugs at school, period”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. FSE v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.