Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

993 So. 2d 1030

Docket No. 2D07-676.

DER v. State

D.E.R., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 25, 2008.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2008-01-25

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 2018

7 state decisions

Relies on State v. TG · JMB v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2008-01-25

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Allyn M. Giambalvo, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

¶2D.E.R., pro se.

¶3Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Cerese Crawford Taylor, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

¶4SILBERMAN, Judge.

¶5We affirm the order withholding adjudication and placing D.E.R. on probation without prejudice to his filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the circuit court to challenge the voluntariness of his plea based on alleged ineffective assistance of counsel. See State v. T.G.,800 So.2d 204, 213 (Fla.2001) (recognizing that Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 does not apply to juvenile proceedings); J.M.B. v. State,750 So.2d 654, 655 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999) (stating that when a juvenile does not file a motion to withdraw his plea, "the proper avenue for a juvenile to challenge the voluntariness of his plea is by petition for writ of habeas corpus in the circuit court").

¶6Affirmed.

¶7SALCINES and VILLANTI, JJ., concur.

/993/so2d/1030 · .json · Public domain