993 So. 2d 1086 - Guard v. Guard’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
December 2018
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 382 So. 2d 1197 - Canakaris v. Canakaris · 932 So. 2d 245 - Schram v. Schram · Scapin v. Scapin · 578 So. 2d 497 - Ensley v. Ensley · 852 So. 2d 277 - Wendel v. Wendel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Child care costs incurred on behalf of the children due to employment, job search, or education calculated to result in employment or to enhance income of current employment of either parent shall be reduced by 25 percent and then shall be added to the basic obligation. After the adjusted child care costs are added to the basic obligation, any moneys prepaid by the noncustodial parent for child care costs for the child or children of this action shall be deducted from that noncustodial parent’s child support obligation for that child or those children.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“pursuit of his own interests or through less than diligent and bona fide efforts to find employment paying income at a level equal to or better than that formerly received,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“what that parent has done since the prior employment, ie., whether he or she has remained unemployed or underemployed voluntarily”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.