Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 993 SO2D 593 - Embleton v. Senatus

Embleton v. Senatus’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Trotter v. State · Rolling v. State · 699 So. 2d 629 - Dobson v. State · 706 So. 2d 1328 - Gore v. State · 884 So. 2d 990 - Weinstein Design Group, Inc. v. Fielder

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A juror should be excluded for cause when her statements confirm that she cannot set aside 'the edge' that she would give one party at the beginning of the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “a trial court generally has a 'unique vantage point' to assess the appropriateness of a challenge for cause,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.