Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 993 SO2D 799 - Dicorte v. Landrieu

Dicorte v. Landrieu’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Montelepre v. Waring Architects · American LifeCare, Inc. v. Wood · 807 So. 2d 335 - Belleville Historic Dev., LLC v. GCI CONST., INC.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “| ,A- Where the award was procured by corruption, fraud, or undue means. B. Where there was evident partiality or corruption on the part of the arbitrators or any of them. C. Where the arbitrators were guilty of misconduct in refusing to postpone the hearing, upon sufficient cause shown, or in refusing to hear evidence pertinent and material to the controversy, or of any other misbehavior by which the rights of any party have been prejudiced. D. Where the arbitrators exceeded their powers or so imperfectly executed them that a mutual, final, and definite award upon the subject matter submitted was not made. Where an award is vacated and the time within which the agreement required the award to be made has not expired, the court may, in its discretion, direct a rehearing by the arbitrators.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “At the outset, we note the positive law of Louisiana favors arbitration. See La. Rev.Stat. § 9:4201. La.Rev.Stat. § 9:4201 specifically provides: A provision in any written contract to settle by arbitration a controversy thereafter arising out of the contract, or out of the refusal to perform the whole or any part thereof, or an agreement in writing between two or more persons to submit to arbitration any controversy existing between them at the time of the agreement to submit, shall be valid, irrevocable, and enforceable, save upon such grounds as exist at law or in equity for the revocation of any contract.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.