State v. Wilcox’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 20th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Dillehey v. State · Rodriguez v. State · Williams v. State · Basaldua v. State · State v. Ross
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Because an order deferring adjudication does not constitute or contain a sentence [as defined by TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC . art. 42.02 ], article 44.01(b) does not apply. As a consequence, the State is not entitled to appeal, and we are without jurisdiction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The state is entitled to appeal a sentence in a case on the ground that the sentence is illegal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.