United States v. Lambert’s Empirical Analysis
994 F.2d 1088 · 1993
Citation profile
29 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently November 2016 · most notably United States v. Boulware (2010), United States v. Lowe (1995)
29 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (Hobbs Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 33 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553
Relies on Halas v. Department of Energy · United States v. Enmons · United States v. Lambey · United States v. Toler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We review challenges to the district court’s guideline selection de novo.”). However, the determination under USSG § 2X5.1 as to whether there is a single "most analogous offense guideline,” and, if not, how to proceed under 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (b), involves the application of a guideline to the facts of a case, and 18 U.S.C. § 3742 (e) mandates that we give “due deference”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a guideline need not address every aspect of charged conduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.