Bender v. Brumley’s Empirical Analysis
994 F.2d 1151 · 1993
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
September 1993
most recently cited
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Kotteakos v. United States · Whitley v. Albers · Hudson v. McMillian
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“any defect in the instructions and provides a basis to sustain the verdict even though Hudson abolished the significant injury requirement. This argument must fail. As illustrated above, before even reaching the question of whether the officers' actions were objectively unreasonable, the jury was first required to agree that Bender had suffered a significant injury:”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bender v. Brumley“directed verdict standard nonetheless to review the court's denial of Bender's directed verdict motion, we would affirm the trial court's decision. The well-established Boeing standard instructs us to”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Bender v. Brumley“such instruction was harmless error as the jury specifically found that none of the defendants used excessive force which was objectively unreasonable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bender v. Brumley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.