Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 994 F.2d 13 - Rosenboro v. Kim

Rosenboro v. Kim’s Empirical Analysis

994 F.2d 13 · 1993

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
June 2023
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 30 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently June 2023 · most notably Sanchez v. Monumental Life Insurance (1996), 384 F. Supp. 2d 257 - Hunter v. District of Columbia (2005)

7 federal appellate · 30 district ·

2301993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)

Relies on McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp. · St Paul Mercury Indemnity Co v. Red Cab Co · Troy Bank of Troy Indiana v. G a Whitehead & Company · Nelson v. Keefer · Zumerling v. Devine

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “appear[s] to a legal certainty that the claim is really for less than the jurisdictional amount.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions where the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $50,000, exclusive of interest and costs, and is between--(1) citizens of different states....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Congress, in amending § 1332 to raise the amount in controversy limit to $50,000, sought to stem the tide of diversity litigation in the federal courts.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.