Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 994 F.2d 1426 - International Union of Operating Engineers-Employers Construction Industry Pension, Welfare & Training Trust Funds v. Karr

International Union of Operating Engineers-Employers Construction Industry Pension, Welfare & Training Trust Funds v. Karr’s Empirical Analysis

994 F.2d 1426 · 1993

Citation profile

86
cited by 86 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
May 2023
most recently cited

35 federal appellate · 3 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 86 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2023 · most notably Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt (2016), Adams v. California Department of Health Services (2007)

35 federal appellate · 3 district · 6 state decisions

3701993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Porzig v. Nolden · Wrenn v. Ohio Department of Mental Health · Dixson v. United States · Credithrift of America, Inc. v. United States · Hummell v. S. E. Rykoff & Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 86 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) whether rights or interests established in the prior judgment would be destroyed or impaired by prosecution of the second action; (2) whether substantially the same evidence is presented in the two actions; (3) whether the two suits involve infringement of the same ■right; and (4) whether the two suits arise out of the same transactional nucleus of facts.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Whether two events are part of the same transaction or series depends on whether they are related to the same set of facts and whether they could conveniently be tried together.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The fact that some different evidence may be presented in this action . . . does not defeat the bar of res judicata.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.