Weber v. American Express Co.’s Empirical Analysis
994 F.2d 513 · 1993
Citation profile
23 federal appellate · 12 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently February 2014 · most notably Torgerson v. City of Rochester (2011), Wallin v. Minnesota Department of Corrections (1998)
23 federal appellate · 12 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United States · Carnegie v. United States · Scharffe v. Perkins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to establish a factual dispute on each element of the prima facie case, summary judgment is appropriate.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“only if the record, when viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party and giving the nonmoving party the benefit of all reasonable factual inferences, shows no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.