Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 994 F.2d 684 - United States v. LeMaux

United States v. LeMaux’s Empirical Analysis

994 F.2d 684 · 1993

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
2
states following
August 2015
most recently cited

28 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently August 2015 · most notably United States v. Baker (1993), United States v. Ponce (1995)

28 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

300199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Benjamin v. United States · Washington Post Co. v. Rebozo · Gregory v. Frontier Materials, Inc. · Charter Co. v. Certified Class in the Charter Securities Litigation · Rust v. Sullivan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “expressly limited to a situation where some of the supervisees, presented as such by the government to the jury, could not legally have been supervisees.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he variances between the amounts of cocaine charged in the indictment and the amounts proved at trial did not prejudice [the defendant's] substantive rights and so were not fatal to the prosecution's case.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “sufficiently explicit to inform [the defendant] of the charges against him[,]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.