Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 994 F.2d 942 - United States v. Rivera

United States v. Rivera’s Empirical Analysis

994 F.2d 942 · 1993

Citation profile

433
cited by 433 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
April 2018
most recently cited

330 federal appellate · 35 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 433 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2018 · most notably Koon v. United States (1996), United States v. Pierro (1994)

330 federal appellate · 35 district ·

3260199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 18 U.S.C. § 664 (Welfare and Pension Plans Disclosure Act)

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca · Solem v. Helm · Vandygriff v. Phillips · Hannahville Indian Community v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 433 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1) What features of this case, potentially, take it outside the Guidelines’ “heartland” and make of it a special, or unusual, case? 2) Has the Commission forbidden departures based on those features? 3) If not, has the Commission encouraged departures based on those features? 4) If not, has the Commission discouraged departures based on those features?”
    32 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “structure and theory of both relevant individual guidelines and the Guidelines taken as a whole,”
    19 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “not involve a 'quintessential legal' interpretation of the words of a guideline, but rather will amount to a judgment about whether the given circumstances, as seen from the district court's unique vantage point, are usual or ordinary, ordinary or not ordinary, and to what extent.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.