994 F. Supp. 2d 77 - Shaheen v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
5 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1391 · 28 U.S.C. § 1406
Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson · Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty. · M/s Bremen v. Zapata off-Shore Company · California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking Unlimited
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“nothing in the plaintiff's Response or Complaint demonstrates that the defendants' website was created, is maintained, or has its servers in Washington, D.C.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“it is well established that a suit for [copyright] infringement is analogous to other tort actions”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“tortious injury in the District of Columbia by an act or omission in the District of Columbia.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.