Rodriguez v. State

Chantal RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 15, 2008.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2008-01-15

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently July 2018

5 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2008-01-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Paul Morris, Miami, for petitioner.

¶2Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Heidi Milan Caballero, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

¶3Before COPE and GREEN, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5In the light of the state's candidand, we find, correctconfession of error in the trial court's determination, after an Arthur hearing, that the defendant had committed a non-bondable offense, the writ is granted and the cause remanded with directions to the trial court to fix a reasonable bond.