Bailey v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Roviaro v. United States · 194 So. 2d 250 - Westberry v. Daves Auto Parts · 357 So. 2d 706 - State v. Munford · 439 So. 2d 1024 - State v. Acosta · 343 So. 2d 67 - Munford v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When a defendant files a sworn motion or affidavit alleging facts regarding the informant's involvement that, if true, would support the possibility of a specific defense, the trial court is required to conduct an in-camera hearing to consider the necessity of the informant's testimony and the State's interest in nondisclosure.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.