994 So. 2d 484 - Beebe v. Roman’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
November 2014
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 382 So. 2d 1197 - Canakaris v. Canakaris · Kennedy v. Kennedy · 927 So. 2d 981 - Matajek v. Skowronska · 549 So. 2d 219 - Pirino v. Pirino · 632 So. 2d 1146 - Naugle v. Naugle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In determining the alimony amount, the trial court observed that both parties had suffered “a substantial and dramatic reduction in their standard of living as a result of the marital breakup” and that an equalization of their net incomes would place both parties “in an equal[ly] miserable situation of not having enough money to sustain the lifestyle that they both enjoyed during the course of the marital relationship.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.