994 So. 2d 765 - Evans v. Evans’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited
17 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Brabham v. Brabham · 547 So. 2d 766 - Nichols v. Tedder · Pass v. Pass · 564 So. 2d 839 - Cumberland v. Cumberland · 579 So. 2d 543 - Caldwell v. Caldwell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) increased needs caused by advanced age and maturity of the children (2) increase in expenses, and (3) inflation factor. Other factors include (4) the relative financial condition and earning capacity of the parties, (5) the health and special needs of the child, both physical and psychological, (6) the health and special medical needs of the parents, both physical and psychological, (7) the necessary living expenses of the father, (8) the estimated amount of income taxes the respective parties must pay on their incomes, (9) the free use of a residence, furnishings, and automobile and (10) such other facts and circumstances that bear on the support subject shown by the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ruth v. Burchfield
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.