Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 994 S.W.2d 176 - Pearson v. State

Pearson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently April 2018 · most notably Vidaurri v. State (2001), Vasquez v. State (2012)

1 federal appellate · 30 state decisions

190199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Issa v. State · Duhart v. State · Borders v. State · Pearson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As we explained in Pearson, it is immaterial that the presentation of the evidence occurred before the actual words of adjudication. Hardeman had the opportunity to present evidence during the proceedings, and that is all that is required. Therefore, Hardeman cannot show that counsel erred by fading to object nor can he show he was harmed by counsel’s failure to object.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Anything you want to tell about what I ought to do on the — let’s assume I revoke by virtue of the allegations, anything you want to offer on what the term may or may not be, should I continue you, some sort of alternative sanctions, if I do find the allegations to be true, what term should I consider? Anything you want to offer on that?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “improperly sentenced without the opportunity to present evidence prior to sentencing ... the error is preserved by raising it in a motion for new trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.