Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 994 SW2D 658 - Manuel v. State

Manuel v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

123
cited by 123 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 110 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 123 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably Nix v. State (2001), Vidaurri v. State (2001)

10 federal appellate · 110 state decisions

860199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Davis v. State · Watson v. State · Dillehey v. State · Whetstone v. State · McDougal v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 123 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] defendant placed on deferred adjudication community supervision may raise issues relating to the original plea proceeding, such as evidentiary sufficiency, only in appeals taken when deferred adjudication community supervision is first imposed.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “first point of discussion” is not a point of error, we have renumbered appellant's remaining points. 3 . Article 44.01 (j) of the Code of Criminal Procedure provides in relevant part that ”[t]he defendant’s right to appeal under Article 44.02 may be prosecuted by the defendant where the punishment assessed is in accordance with Subsection (a), Section 3d, Article 42.12 of this code_” Article 44.02 provides that a”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “placed on 'regular' community supervision may raise issues relating to the conviction, such as evidentiary sufficiency, only in appeals taken when community supervision is originally imposed”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.