Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 995 A2D 934 - Page v. State

Page v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

17 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Williams v. Taylor · McMann v. Richardson · Wiggins v. Smith, Warden

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “demonstrate that the deficient performance was so prejudicial to the defense and the errors were so serious as to amount to a deprivation of the applicant's right to a fair trial.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “counsel's performance was deficient, to the point that the errors were so serious that trial counsel did not function at the level guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment;”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.