United States v. Higgins’s Empirical Analysis
995 F.2d 1 · 1993
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 11 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently April 2015 · most notably Sherwood v. Mulvihill (1997), United States v. Manning (1996)
10 federal appellate · 11 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924
Relies on Franks v. Delaware · Hayes v. Lockhart · In re Disbarment of Schaefer · Michigan Citizens for an Independent Press v. Thornburgh · United States v. Slade
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When a defendant offers proof of an -2- omission, the 'issue is whether, even had the omitted statements been included in the affidavit, there was still probable cause to issue the warrant.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“‘a district court need not ■ conduct an in camera hearing whenever the identity of an informant is requested.’”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.