United States v. Lambert’s Empirical Analysis
995 F.2d 1006 · 1993
Citation profile
69 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 113 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2025 · most notably United States v. Robinson (1994), United States v. Green (1999)
69 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 2113
Relies on Stinson v. United States · Mitan v. United States · Holywell Corp. v. Smith · Holder v. Hall · United States v. Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 113 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'Other act evidence is intrinsic when the evidence of the other act and the evidence of the crime charged are inextricably intertwined or both acts are part of a single criminal episode or the other acts were necessary preliminaries to the crime charged.'”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Factual findings made at sentencing are reviewed under a clearly erroneous standard, but the district court's legal interpretation of the guidelines is reviewed de novo.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“or the person behind me will shoot someone”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.