Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

995 F.2d 1062

Docket No. 92-1485.

Brown v. Berkeley County

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: April 21, 1993. Decided: June 21, 1993.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1993-06-21

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Brown v. Saunders

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1993-06-21

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-89-1103-2-18)

Omar Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

James Albert Stuckey, Jr., Stuckey & Kobrovsky, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Omar Brown appeals a district court jury verdict in favor of the Defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) action challenging his dismissal, and the district court's subsequent denial of his motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm the verdict and the district court's denial of Brown's postjudgment motion. Brown v. Berkeley County, No. CA-89-1103-2-18 (D.S.C. July 23, 1991 & Feb. 3, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/995/f2d/1062 · .json · Public domain