Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

995 F.2d 1063

Docket No. 93-6072.

Hughey v. Hampton

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: April 21, 1993. Decided: June 21, 1993.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1993-06-21

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Noll v. Getty

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1993-06-21

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-92-685-3-17)

Charles J. Hughey, Appellant Pro Se.

Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

D.S.C.

DISMISSED.

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

¶1

Charles J. Hughey seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal. Hughey v. Hampton, No. CA-92-685-3-17 (D.S.C. Jan. 8, 1993). We deny Hughey's Motion to Vacate Sentence filed in this Court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

/995/f2d/1063 · .json · Public domain