United States v. Simpson’s Empirical Analysis
995 F.2d 109 · 1993
Citation profile
22 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently August 2013
22 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 3237 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742
Relies on Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Weintraub · Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Massachusetts · United States v. Jordan · United States v. Johnson · United States v. Brown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where a defendant persists in asserting entrapment, she cannot also claim acceptance of responsibility.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The district court erred when it figured the amount of loss, however, in that it failed to deduct a $74,000 premium from the $838,900 false claims. If Simpson had seen his scheme through to payment, [the insurance company] would have deducted the premium from the amount of Simpson’s claims. As the government conceded at oral argument, the proper amount of loss was the amount of the claims minus the premium .... This clear error requires a remand so that the district judge may recalculate Simpson’s sentence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.