Drexel Burnham Lambert Group, Inc. v. Claimants Identified on Schedule 1’s Empirical Analysis
995 F.2d 1138 · 1993
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 63 later decisions — most recently October 2024 · most notably Goldberger v. Integrated Resources, Inc. (2000), Hormel Foods Corporation v. Jim Henson Productions Inc (1996)
17 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner · Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission · Missouri v. Continential Insurance Cos. · Brown Shoe Co. v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“prevent[s] the courts, through avoidance of premature adjudication, from entangling themselves in abstract disagreements . . . .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“groundless, without foundation, and without merit,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“notice is adequate so long as it is reasonably calculated to apprise the parties of the terms of a proposed settlement and the options available in connection with the judicial proceeding”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Dinova
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.