Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 995 F.2d 1440 - Kendrick v. Carlson

Kendrick v. Carlson’s Empirical Analysis

995 F.2d 1440 · 1993

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
2
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently April 2017 · most notably United States v. Boyd (2000), Taylor v. Sawyer (2002)

13 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions

180199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3585 · 21 U.S.C. § 848 (§ 408 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 455

Relies on Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Snowden v. Hughes · United Transportation Union v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority · Penson v. Ohio · Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The fact that Kendrick received credit against his foreign sentence for the entire period he was in custody in Curacao would preclude him from also receiving credit against his federal sentence for any portion of that period of time.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “credit must be given only when the pre-sentence custody is federal custody or non-federal custody that was caused or sustained by the federal government.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[The petitioner] owed a debt to two separate sovereigns, each of which had a right to exact its debt independently of the other.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.