Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 995 F.2d 565 - United States v. Robichaux

United States v. Robichaux’s Empirical Analysis

995 F.2d 565 · 1993

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
March 2024
most recently cited

20 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2024 · most notably United States v. Cabrera (2002), United States v. Hall (1998)

20 federal appellate ·

1901993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · Santoni v. United States · Energy Cooperative, Inc. v. Phillips Petroleum Co. · United States v. Beechum

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “not clearly erroneous to assume that if [the independent auditor] had not issued a favorable audit for [the insurer], which only occurred because of [the insurer's] fraudulently inflated balance sheet, the Commission would have acted to liquidate the firm at an earlier date and minimized the losses.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the loss need not be determined with precision. The court need only make a reasonable estimate of the loss, given the available information.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Proof of intent may arise by inference from all of the facts and circumstances surrounding the transactions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.