Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

995 F.2d 880

Docket No. 90-1036.

Lashley v. Delo

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided June 22, 1993.

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1993-06-22

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently July 2001

1 federal appellate ·

Relies on Delo v. Lashley · Lashley v. Armontrout

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1993-06-22

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Chief Judge, FAGG, Circuit Judge, and WATERS,* District Judge.

¶3ORDER

¶4The United States Supreme Court reversed this court’s holding that the trial judge violated the Eighth Amendment by refusing to give a mitigating circumstance instruction requested by Lashley during the penalty phase of Lashley’s trial. Delo v. Lashley, — U.S.-,-, 113 S.Ct. 1222, 1226, 122 L.Ed.2d 620 (1993). The Supreme Court’s opinion, coupled with this court’s earlier opinion rejecting Lashley’s other .claims, 957 F.2d 1495 (8th Cir.1992), disposes of the case. We thus affirm the district court’s denial of Lashley’s application for a writ of habeas corpus. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

/995/f2d/880 · .json · Public domain