Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

995 F.3d 670

D. D. v. Lausd

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided May 6, 2021

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2021-05-06

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 2021

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2021-05-06

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

                             FOR PUBLICATION                            FILED
                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                         MAY 6 2021
                                                                     MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                                                                      U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                         FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

D. D., a minor, by and through his Guardian No. 19-55810
Ad Litem, Michaela Ingram,
                                            D.C. No.
                Plaintiff-Appellant,        2:19-cv-00399-PA-PLA
                                            Central District of California,
 v.                                         Los Angeles

LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL                    ORDER
DISTRICT,

               Defendant-Appellee.

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

      Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)

and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.

/995/f3d/670 · .json · Public domain