Schmidt v. Callahan’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
5 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently September 2012
5 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Califano v. Sanders · Brewster v. Derwinski · Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Pemberton · 14129b Castellano v. Secretary of Health and Human Services · Connors v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[H]ighly marketable skills simply requires very little, if any, vocational adjustment ... in terms of work processes, work setting, or the industry.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Kerns v. Apfel
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.