J.G. v. Mills’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975) · 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Friends of the Earth Incorporateds v. Laidlaw Environmental Services Inc · City of Los Angeles v. Lyons · Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor · O'Shea v. Littleton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“student denied a timely enrollment, an appropriate placement, or special education services identified in an IEP[ ] plainly suffers a very severe harm,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.