Koenig v. Boulder Brands, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 321 (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 331 (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 337 (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 343 (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 343 (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 393 (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 61
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc. · Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. Thompson · Gibbons v. Ogden
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Consistent with the statute's purpose of promoting uniform national labeling standards, the NLEA includes an express preemption provision that forbids the states from 'directly or indirectly establish[ing] ... any requirement ... made in the labeling of food that is not identical to' the federal labeling requirements established by certain specifically enumerated sections of the FDCA.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“to clarify and to strengthen the [FDA's] legal authority to require nutrition labeling on foods, and to establish the circumstances under which claims may be made about nutrients in foods.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Privity is normally an essential element of a cause of action for express warranty, but the U.C.C. includes a personal injury exception: A seller’s warranty whether express or implied extends to any natural person if it is reasonable to expect that such person may use, consume or be affected by the goods and who is injured in person by breach of the warranty.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.