Smith v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
36 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently February 2024 · most notably 2003 UT App 170 - State v. Sloan (2003), A.S. v. R.S. (2017)
36 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Thomas · State v. Rimmasch · State v. Herrera · R & R Energies v. Mother Earth Industries, Inc. · Rosendahl v. Rosendahl
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An issue is inadequately briefed when 'the overall analysis of the issue is so lacking as to shift the burden of research and argument to the reviewing court.'”
15 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Jacob v. Cross · Osborne v. Osborne“[alppellant bears the burden of demonstrating the validity of [his] points on appeal”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Briefs that are not in compliance with Rule 24 may be disregarded ... by the court.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.